Comparative analysis of Australian climate change and COVID-19 vaccine audience segments shows climate skeptics … – Nature.com

  • Botzen, W., Duijndam, S. & van Beukering, P. Lessons for climate policy from behavioral biases towards COVID-19 and climate change risks. World Dev. 137, 105214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105214 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M. & Thornton, P. What can COVID-19 teach us about responding to climate change? Lancet Planet. Health 4(5), E174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30085-1 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenert, D., Funke, F., Mattauch, L. & O’Callaghan, B. Five lessons from COVID-19 for advancing climate change mitigation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76, 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00453-w (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depoux, A. & Gemenne, F. A few points that communication on climate change could learn from the COVID-19 crisis. In Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change (eds Holmes, D. C. & Richardson, L. M.) 272–278 (Edward Elgar, 2020).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., White, J. M. & Standring, A. Social scientific knowledge in times of crisis: What climate change can learn from coronavirus (and vice versa). WIREs Clim. Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.656 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, D., Petersen, B. & Gunderson, R. Shared pretenses for collective inaction: The economic growth imperative, COVID-19, and climate change. Globalizations. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1943897 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. et al. Challenges to evidence-informed decision-making in the context of pandemics: The case of COVID-19. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3971551 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poot, C. C. et al. From research to evidence-informed decision making: A systematic approach. J. Public Health 40(supplement 1), i3–i12. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöckigt, G., Schiebener, J. & Brand, M. Providing sustainability information in shopping situations contributes to sustainable decision making: An empirical study with choice-based conjoint analyses. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 43, 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.018 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. In Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online (eds Chiluwa, I. & Samoilenko, S.) 281–306 (IGI Global, 2019).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K., Rhodes, T. & Rosengarten, M. Making evidence and policy in public health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 for adaptive evidence-making and intervention. Evid. Policy 16(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15913559981103 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, A. M. Organized climate change denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (eds Dryzek, J. S. et al.) 144–160 (Oxford University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenbeek, J. et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amazeen, M. A., Krishna, A. & Eschmann, R. Cutting the bunk: Comparing the solo and aggregate effects of prebunking and debunking COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Sci. Commun. 44, 387. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221111558 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. & Ecker, U. K. H. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. et al. I just don’t trust them: The development and validation of an assessment instrument to measure trust in science and scientists. Sch. Sci. Math. 114(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12051(2014) (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutjens, B. T. et al. Science skepticism across 24 countries. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 13(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, L. H., England, K., Lovejoy, D. & Drury, K. Attitudes toward psychology relative to other disciplines. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 29(2), 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.29.2.140 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, N. & Swim, J. K. Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. J. Environ. Psychol. 47, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. & Cummings, C. L. Influence of rapid COVID-19 vaccine development on vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine 39(52), 7625–7632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.014 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, K., Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T. & Mede, N. Are science communication audiences becoming more critical? Reconstructing migration between audience segments based on Swiss panel data. Public Underst. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211057379 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, M. D., Ling, M., Williams, M. N., Kerr, J. R. & McLennan, J. Australasian public awareness and belief in conspiracy theories: Motivational correlates. Polit. Psychol. 43(1), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12746 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 (2020).

  • Wu, X., Lu, Y., Zhou, S., Chen, L. & Xu, B. Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: Empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environ. Int. 86, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.007 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morens, D. M. et al. The origin of COVID-19 and why it matters. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103(3), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0849 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poushter, J., & Huang, C. Despite Pandemic, Many Europeans Still See Climate Change as Greatest Threat to Their Countries. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/09/09/despite-pandemic-many-europeans-still-see-climate-change-as-greatest-threat-to-their-countries/ (Pew Research Center, 2020).

  • Gavin, N. T. Media definitely do matter: Brexit, immigration, climate change and beyond. Brit. J. Polit. Int. Rel. 20(4), 827–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481187992 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. Information sources, perceived personal experience, and climate change beliefs. J. Environ. Psychol. 81, 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101796 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. Emission Reductions from Pandemic Had Unexpected Effects on Atmosphere. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/emission-reductions-from-pandemic-had-unexpected-effects-on-atmosphere (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2021).

  • Drummond, C. & Fischhoff, B. Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(36), 9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J. & Saito, K. Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015602752 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M. & van der Lee, R. Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 44(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741314 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheitle, C. P. & Corcoran, K. E. COVID-19 skepticism in relation to other forms of science skepticism. Socius Sociol. Res. Dyn. World 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211049841 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. C. Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim. Change 104(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul. Environ. 32(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. M. Gender differences in knowledge and attitude towards biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 19(6), 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509335449 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. R., Ballew, M. T., Naiman, S. & Schuldt, J. P. Race, class, gender and climate change communication. Oxford Res. Encycl. Clim. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.412 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Q. 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold-Forster, A. Polarisation, incivility, and scientific debate during covid-19—An essay. BMJ 374, n1888. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1888 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. P. Scientists as public experts: Expectations and responsibilities. In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology 3rd edn (eds Bucchi, M. & Trench, B.) 114–128 (Taylor & Francis, 2021).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, R. & Druckman, J. N. Motivated reasoning and climate change. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.009 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, B. The great divide: Political candidate and voter polarisation over global warming in Australia. Aust. J. Polit. Hist. 59(3), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12023 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnek, G., Kossowska, M. & Szwed, P. Right-wing ideology reduces the effects of education on climate change beliefs in more developed countries. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00930-6 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • May, T. Anti-vaxxers, politicization of science, and the need for trust in pandemic response. J. Health Commun. 25(10), 761–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1864519 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savelkaeva, A., Polyakova, V. & Fursov, K. S. Structure of social attitudes to science and technology: National and individual determinants. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, No. WP BRP 52/STI/2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698107 (2015).

  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G. & Fielding, K. S. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, P. K. M. COVID-19 vaccination intention in the Western Pacific Region—Insights from Japan. Lancet Reg. Health West. Pac. 14, 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100245 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzinger, M., Watson, V., Arwidson, P., Alla, F. & Luchini, S. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: A survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. Lancet Public Health 6(4), e210–e221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00012-8 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B., Biddle, N., Gray, M. & Sollis, K. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: Correlates in a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0248892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248892 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nery, N. et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors according to sex: A population-based survey in Salvador, Brazil. PLoS ONE 17(1), e0262649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262649(2022) (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. & Li, G. M. Hesitancy in the time of coronavirus: Temporal, spatial, and sociodemographic variations in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. SSM Popul. Health 15, 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100896 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., Edwards, M., Lobera, J., Díaz-Catalán, C. & Barlow, F. K. Resolving the small-pockets problem helps clarify the role of education and political ideology in shaping vaccine sceptics. Br. J. Psychol. 112(4), 992–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12500 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environ. Polit. 25(2), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozenbeek, J. et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7(10), 33204475. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, B., Porter, E. & Wood, T. J. Time and skeptical opinion content erode the effects of science coverage on climate beliefs and attitudes. PNAS 119(26), e2122069119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122069119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, D. W. et al. Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. WIREs Clim. Change 5(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.279 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M. D. Theory and method in health audience segmentation. J. Health Commun. 1(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107396128059 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A. et al. Global Warming’s Six Americas, September 2021 (Yale University and George Mason University, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, K. J., Smith, T. L., Salmon, C. T., Thomas, B. D. H. & Poorisat, T. Public health communication campaigns. In The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication (eds Thompson, T. L. & Harrington, G. N.) 335–352 (Taylor & Francis Group, 2021).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milosh, M., Painter, M., Sonin, K., Van Dijcke, D. & Wright, A. L. Unmasking partisanship: Polarization undermines public response to collective risk. J. Public Econ. 204, 104538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104538 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P. Science is political, and we must deal with it. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12(27), 6336–6340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02017 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Miao, M. & Gan, Y. Perceived control buffers the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on general health and life satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological distance. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 12(4), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12232 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. S., Zwickle, A., Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 73, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.011 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detenber, B. & Rosenthal, S. Climate change audience segmentation: An international review. In Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change (eds Holmes, D. C. & Richardson, L. M.) 214–229 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chryst, B. et al. Six Americas Super Short Survey (SASSY!) https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/sassy/ (Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2021).

  • Morrison, M., Parton, K. & Hine, D. W. Increasing belief but issue fatigue: Changes in Australian household climate change segments between 2011 and 2016. PLoS ONE 13(6), e0197988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197988 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agley, J. & Xiao, Y. Misinformation about COVID-19: Evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science. BMC Publ. Health 21(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Attwell, K. & Evers, U. Support for a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in the face of safety concerns and political affiliations: An Australian study. Politics 42(3), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211009066 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleitman, S. et al. To comply or not comply? A latent profile analysis of behaviours and attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255268 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-J., Chang, Y.-P., Chou, W.-J. & Yen, C.-F. Differences in the Protection Motivation Theory constructs between people with various latent classes of motivation for vaccination and preventive behaviors against COVID-19 in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(13), 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137042 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thaker, J. Audience Segmentation of COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions in Aotearoa-New Zealand [Report] (Massey University, 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaker, J., Richardson, L. M., & Holmes, D. C. Audience segmentation analysis of public intentions to get a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia. Public Underst. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221138494 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B., Palm, R. & Feng, B. Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environ. Polit. 28(5), 793–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1512261 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassam, N. & Leser, H. Climate Poll 2021. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/climatepoll-2021 (Lowy Institute, 2021).

  • Quicke, A. Climate of the Nation 2021. https://australiainstitute.org.au/report/climate-of-the-nation-2021/ (The Australia Institute, 2021).

  • Neumann, C., Stanley, S. K., Leviston, Z. & Walker, I. The six Australias: Concern about climate change (and global warming) is rising. Environ. Commun. 16(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2048407 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryst, B. et al. Global warming’s “six Americas short survey”: Audience segmentation of climate change views using a four question instrument. Environ. Commun. 12(8), 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1508047 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Mertz, C. K. & Akerlof, K. Global Warming’s Six Americas Screening Tools: Survey Instruments, Instructions for Coding and Data Treatment, and Statistical Program Scripts. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (Yale University and George Mason University, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. COVID-19 Vaccination—Vaccination Data—1 February 2022. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/covid-19-vaccination-vaccination-data-1-february-2022 (Australian Government, 2022).

  • Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S. & van der Lee, R. Science skepticism in times of COVID-19. Group Process. Integr. 24(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220981415 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, H. Generational identities: Historical and literary perspectives. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 15(10), e12641. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12641 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aviste, R., Lengieza, M. L. & Fasano, C. J. OK Boomer: A decade of generational differences in feelings about climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 73, 102479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102479 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duell, N. et al. Age patterns in risk taking across the world. J. Youth Adoles. 47, 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0752-y (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R. & Betz, N. E. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, A., Hoq, M., Measey, M.-A. & Danchin, M. Intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Australia. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21(5), e110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30724-6 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. W. & Givens, J. E. Gender and climate change views in context: A cross-national multilevel analysis. Soc. Sci. J. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1913041 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. The different dynamics of personal and general risk. Risk Manag. 5, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240154 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. Solving the wickedest problem: Reconciling differing worldviews. J. Future Stud. 24(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.202006_24(4).0008 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorini, H. I. Science as a political battlefield: How cultural values shape people’s attitudes to science. In Political Identity and Democratic Citizenship in Turbulent Times (ed. Kristensen, N. N.) 29–53 (IGI Global, 2020).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Qualtrics Panel. Online Panels. https://www.qualtrics.com/au/research-services/online-sample/ (Qualtrics XM, 2022).

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3235.0—Regional Population by Age and Sex, Australia. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Explanatory%20Notes/3235.0 (2020).

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Census QuickStats. https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036 (2017).

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census 2016, Total Personal Income (Weekly) by Age by Sex (SA2+). https://stat.data.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ABS_C16_T13_SA (2017).

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. National, State and Territory Population. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release#states-and-territories (2021).

  • Myers, T. A. Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Commun. Methods Meas. 5(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624490 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (eds Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J.) 11–39 (Springer, 1985).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Source